Objective:
Defining sourcing criteria & selecting the right supplier by using below methodologies:
Enterprise Ranking
Industry Trend
Competitive Positioning
Strategic Objectives
Summary
The suppliers should fulfill the following criteria:
Innovative/Flexible
Technologically Capable
Reliable
Responsive
Timely Delivery
Bargain Power
Profitability/Pricing
Marketing Intelligence
Analyzing the market for right supplier & price offerings
Market Intelligence
Competition Intensity
Summary
Potential Suppliers for Semi-conductors
Buyer Power Analysis (BPA)
Supplier Analysis I
Price, Profitability, Technology
Supplier Analysis II
Financial Stability & Risk
Supplier Analysis III
Operating Efficiency
Supplier Score Sheet
Rank the best Supplier meeting the criteria
| INTEL | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Notes |
| Innovative, Technological/Engineering Capacity | x | Superior Technology, Innovative | |||
| Manufacturing Capability/Quality | x | Strong Production Capacity, Excellent Quality | |||
| Pricing | x | High Pricing | |||
| Profitability | x | Higher Profitability & Stable | |||
| Bargain Power | x | Intel is making its own chips | |||
| Financial Health | x | Low risk in both LT & ST | |||
| Reliable/Flexible/Responsive | x | Good Operating Efficiency | |||
| Leaks & Competition | x | Will not compete with Samsung |
| Qualcomm | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Notes |
| Innovative, Technological/Engineering Capacity | x | Superior Technology, Innovative | |||
| Manufacturing Capability/Quality | x | Strong Production Capacity, Excellent Quality | |||
| Pricing | x | High Pricing | |||
| Profitability | x | Higher Profitability & Stable | |||
| Bargain Power | x | Intel is making its own chips | |||
| Financial Health | x | Low risk in both LT & ST | |||
| Reliable/Flexible/Responsive | x | Good Operating Efficiency | |||
| Leaks & Competition | x | Will not compete with Samsung |
| Global Foundries | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Notes |
| Innovative, Technological/Engineering Capacity | - | N/A | |||
| Manufacturing Capability/Quality | x | Rapidly built up strong manufacturing capacity | |||
| Pricing | x | Can offer low prices to Samsung | |||
| Profitability | x | Not Profitable | |||
| Bargain Power | x | Samsung has Bargaining Power | |||
| Financial Health | x | Low risk for ST & LT but lost money in many years | |||
| Reliable/Flexible/Responsive | x | Good Operating Efficiency | |||
| Leaks & Competition | x | Will not Compete with Samsung |
| Summary | Intel | Qualcomm | Global Foundries |
| Innovative, Technological/Engineering Capacity | Excellent | Excellent | - |
| Manufacturing Capability/Quality | Excellent | Good | Excellent |
| Pricing | Fair | Poor | Excellent |
| Profitability | Excellent | Good | Poor |
| Bargain Power | Poor | Poor | Excellent |
| Financial Health | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Reliable/Flexible/Responsive | Good | Good | Good |
| Leaks & Competition | Excellent | Fair | Excellent |